Virginia Traffic DUI Lawyers Fairfax Violation Code 18.2-266

Virginia Traffic DUI Lawyers Fairfax

Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with a traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you?

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?

We have defended many traffic tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation. An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Mary v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Defendant appealed from an order of the Circuit Court of Fairfax (Virginia) convicting her of driving under the influence (DUI), second or subsequent offense, in violation of Va. Code Ann. §§ 18.2-266 and 18.2-270.

If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

On appeal, an appellate court reviews the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth. This principle requires the appellate court to discard the evidence of the accused in conflict with that of the Commonwealth, and regard as true all the credible evidence favorable to the Commonwealth and all fair inferences to be drawn therefrom. Its examination of the record is not limited to the evidence mentioned by a party in trial argument or by the trial court in its ruling. In determining whether there is evidence to sustain a conviction, an appellate court must consider all the evidence admitted at trial that is contained in the record.
The "substantially similar" standard under Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-270(E) does not require the statutes to be exact replicas of each other. They merely must be similar (not identical) in a substantial (not insubstantial) way. The statutes need not substantially conform in every respect to each other. Thus, a court need not scrutinize the foreign statute for every idiosyncratic, insubstantial difference between it and the Virginia statute. It looks instead to the overall purpose of the two statutes, the framework of their principal provisions, and the elements of their respective offenses.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket. An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

First Name:
Last Name:
Email @:
Phone #:	--
Message:

Virginia
Fairfax County	703-278-0405
Prince William County	703-278-0405
Loudoun County	703-278-0405
Fredericksburg	703-278-0405
Richmond	804-201-9009
Virginia beach	757-512-5002
Lynchburg	434-509-4004

Maryland
Rockville	240-399-0304
Baltimore	240-399-0304

Criminal/DUI Defense - Virginia Lawyers

Virginia Traffic DUI Lawyers Fairfax Violation Code 18.2-266

0 comments:

Email Us:

Our Phone #

Social Icons

Popular Posts